Economic Inefficiencies in Circular Economy Training Markets: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Professional Development Investment Return

Authors

  • Viraj P. Tathavadekar Research Scholar, Symbiosis International University, Pune, India Author
  • Nitin R. Mahankale Associate Professor, Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Symbiosis International University, Pune, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/bkgtdk19

Keywords:

Circular Economy Training Economics, Sustainability Investment Returns, Professional Development Market Failures, Ai-Enhanced Training Roi, Environmental Competency Economics

Abstract

This analysis examines the economic inefficiencies inherent in contemporary circular economy professional development markets. Organizations invest substantial capital in training programs that yield credentialed practitioners lacking environmental competency and systems-thinking capabilities necessary for effective climate action implementation. Drawing upon fifteen years of cross-cultural sustainability consulting observations, this viewpoint employs economic analysis to examine circular economy training market failures, synthesizing evidence to propose transformative investment strategies. Current professional development programs function as credential mills extracting fees without generating competency, producing professionals engaged in sustainability performance while delivering minimal environmental returns on investment. Human-based traditional training creates cognitive biases and cultural barriers that reduce economic efficiency in environmental outcomes. Evidence suggests that AI-enhanced training systems provide superior returns on training investments through objective competency development. This represents the first comprehensive economic critique positioning current circular economy professional development as generating negative returns on environmental investments, proposing "sustainability performance professionals" as a market construct while asserting technological enhancement as economically necessary rather than optional. Organizations investing in traditional sustainability training generate opportunity costs and reduced environmental performance. Immediate action should focus on pilot programs for technology-enhanced training with gradual transition from conventional certification approaches.

References

[1]Bittner, N., Bakker, N., & Long, T. B. (2024). Circular economy and the hospitality industry: A comparison of the Netherlands and Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, Article 141253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141253

[2]di Santo, N., Califano, G., Sisto, R., Caracciolo, F., & Pilone, V. (2024). Are university students really hungry for sustainability? A choice experiment on new food products from circular economy. Agricultural and Food Economics, 12(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-024-00315-9

[3]Leal Filho, W., Kim, E., Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Marcolin, C. B. (2025). Using artificial intelligence in sustainability teaching and learning. Environmental Sciences Europe, 37(1), Article 1159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01159-w

[4]Marcon, M. L., & Sehnem, S. (2024). Heading towards sustainability: An exploration of circular economy teaching methodologies through games, online platforms, and digital innovations. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), Article 100995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100995

[5]Reich, R. H., & Vermeyen, V. (2025). Integrating the Circular Economy and Life Cycle Thinking into project-based learning of engineering students. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 1972-1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.259

[6]Rejeb, H. B., Muxika, E., & Ghadimi, P. (2024). Summer School on Circular Economy for Sustainable Manufacturing: A Case Study and Lessons Learned. Procedia CIRP, 122, 952-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.01.129

[7]Reynolds, M., Salter, N., Muranko, Ż., Nolan, R., & Charnley, F. (2024). Product life extension behaviours for electrical appliances in UK households: Can consumer education help extend product life amid the cost-of-living crisis? Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 205, Article 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107527

[8]Saha, K., Farhanj, Z., & Kumar, V. (2025). A systematic review of circular economy literature in healthcare: Transitioning from a 'post-waste' approach to sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 505, Article 145427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145427

[9]Timilsina, B., & Nguyen, P. T. (2024). From awareness to practice: Insights from the managers of Finnish circular economy pioneering companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 480, Article 144150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144150

[10]Trevisan, A. H., Boscarato, A., Acerbi, F., Terzi, S., & Sassanelli, C. (2025). Enhancing Circular Economy education and training for the manufacturing sector: A holistic skills framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 380, Article 124982. https://doi.org/10/j.jenvman.2025.124982

[11]Vergani, F. (2024). Higher education institutions as a microcosm of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, Article 140592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140592

[12]Vitti, M., Trevisan, A. H., Ocampo, H. R., Cuentas, V. K., Sarbazvatan, S., Terzi, S., & Sassanelli, C. (2025). A competency map for circular economy education. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 336-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.096

[13]Block, S., Kerzel, S., Harner, S., Leitzmann, M., Puppe, L., & Jochem, C. (2025). Co-developing a planetary health module for pediatrics: A student-led initiative with peer teaching and evaluation of planetary health literacy. Public Health, 246, Article 105829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105829

[14]Choi, Y., Jang, D., Lee, M. S., & Jin, S. J. (2024). Association between ocean literacy and climate change mitigation efforts in the Republic of Korea. Marine Policy, 165, Article 106157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106157

[15]Fizaine, F., & Le Borgne, G. (2025). Climate knowledge matters: A causal analysis of knowledge and individual carbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 385, Article 125604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125604

[16]Hannigan, S., Hradsky, D., Bellingham, R., Raphael, J., & White, P. J. (2025). Reimagining climate change futures: A review of arts-based education programs. Futures, 173, Article 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103667

[17]Ibourk, A., Wagner, L., & Zogheib, K. (2024). Developing Elementary Teachers' Climate Change Knowledge and Self-efficacy for Teaching Climate Change Using Learning Technologies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(3), 504-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10187-9

[18]Kershen, J. L. (2024). Climate Literacy Opportunities and Critique in Paradise on Fire by Jewell Parker Rhodes. Children's Literature in Education, 56(1), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-024-09597-5

[19]Kretschmer, S. (2024). Carbon literacy – Can simple interventions help? Effect of information provision on emissions knowledge of private households. Energy Policy, 188, Article 114060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114060

[20]Peralta, L. R., Forsyth, R., Lapi, N., Amon, K. L., Metsan, P., Wattelez, G., Chen, J., Galy, O., & Caillaud, C. (2025). Health literacy of adolescents' responses to a workshop focusing on food, nutrition, climate change and digital technology solutions in Oceania: A multi-site pilot study in Vanuatu. BMC Public Health, 25(1), Article 21865. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21865-7

[21]Riach, N., & Glaser, R. (2024). Local climate services. Can municipal climate profiles help improve climate literacy? Climate Services, 34, Article 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100449

[22]Zjalic, D., Perilli, A., Nachira, L., Lombardi, G. S., & Cadeddu, C. (2024). PERSIST: A pre-post study to assess an educational methodology to enhance youth climate literacy and systems thinking ability. The Lancet Planetary Health, 8, S7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00072-X

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tathavadekar, V. P., & Nitin R. Mahankale. (2025). Economic Inefficiencies in Circular Economy Training Markets: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Professional Development Investment Return. Sustainable Development Economics, 1(2), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.64229/bkgtdk19